Richard Ha writes:
Yesterday, as I sat in
on a Hawai‘i County Council discussion of the anti-GMO bill, I realized that I
am starting to get a very uncomfortable feeling. It looks like the anti-GMO
effort we are seeing here is being organized and run from the Mainland.
A reporter from the
New York Times attended yesterday’s Hawai‘i Council Council meeting, too. I think
they are tracking the money.
Literacy Project (tagline: “Where Science Trumps Ideology”):
Hawaii anti-GMO ‘corruption’ scandal? Genetic
Literacy Project investigation underway
shaping up to be an ugly week on Hawaii Island. Beginning in Hilo on Wednesday,
September 4, the island Council will again debate controversial measures
designed to curtail the growing of genetically modified crops on the island.
Battle over GMOs on both Hawaii and Kauai has been rancorous, threatening to tear apart the aloha
spirit that has defined the Hawaiian Islands for centuries. The ‘public discussion’
took a sharply political turn in May when Kohala Councilwoman Margaret Wille
brought forward Bill 79, which banned GMOs but proposed to exempt the GMO
Rainbow papaya crop, which is credited by scientists and independent experts
for rescuing the papaya on Hawaii from extinction threatened by the ringspot
79 was widely regarded as a scientific and political mess, as the independent
website Biofortified.org noted in its analysis. The
committee held four days of public comment sessions, with tensions running high
and the debate turning personal. Wille withdrew the bill in early August after
the hearings and a Council discussion made it clear that it was poorly written.
Wille is back with a similar measure. (The
GLP publishes a response to the bill below provided by the Hawaii Papaya
Industry Association.) But this time, she has dubious company. South Kona/Ka‘u
Councilwoman Brenda Ford has introduced her own “book burning” measure,
proposing that all papaya fields be cut down and burned—the position supported
by the more radical anti-GMO activists who have come to dominate the anti side
of the debate.
Funding corruption by anti-GMO campaigners?
leaders opposed to crop biotechnology, such as Walter Ritte, the Molokai-based
political activist, have attempted to frame this battle as David vs. Goliath,
threadbare grassroots campaigners fighting Big Ag. Although they claim their
opposition to the innovative technology is home grown, a Genetic Literacy
Project investigation, still in its infancy, suggests that the opposition is
flush with cash, getting hundreds of thousands of dollars each year from
mainland anti-GMO organic organizations that have an ideological stake in
blocking new farming technologies.
nearly a decade, an impressionable anti-GMO mob mentality has been carefully
cultivated on Hawaii island, but documents reviewed by the GLP suggest this
increasingly ugly turn has been nurtured by slick and well financed outsiders…. Read
Not only is outside
money possibly dictating our future, but also of note is that Councilperson
Brenda Ford arranged for someone named Jeffrey Smith to Skype into the County
Council discussion yesterday from the Mainland.
It takes very little
research to see that Jeffrey Smith is not credible, but goes around the country
scaring people with his unsubstantiated claims that have been widely discredited by
the scientific community. He has no scientific credentials and has
self-published a book called “Genetic Roulette.”
Here’s what the
independent, non-profit organization Academics Review says:
…The “scientific studies” that Smith says support his
theories are thoroughly contradicted by a vast body of data and scientific
experience; they are wholly irresponsible. In his single-minded campaign
against GM crops, Smith has shown an amazing capacity to ignore the scientific
literature on almost every topic he discusses.
But, as he showed at that press conference when he
explained the role that meditation should play in the “collective
consciousness,” Smith is a gifted communicator.
He’s particularly adept at getting his message out via
the latest online methods, which he uses to spread his misinformation about
biotechnology, in particular, to an ever-widening audience. In his most recent
self-published book, Genetic
Roulette, Smith claims to show 65 different “documented health risks”
associated with biotech foods. Not one of them has been found to be
scientifically valid by Academics Review.
Also from Academics Review, which is “an
association of academic professors, researchers, teachers and credentialed
authors from around the world who are committed to the unsurpassed value of the
peer review in establishing sound science. We stand against falsehoods, half-baked
assertions and theories or claims not subjected to this kind of rigorous review:"
Smith has gained fame for claiming biotech foods are dangerous, but none of his claims are based on sound science. Smith has no discernible
scientific training yet makes 65 such claims in his book Genetic
Roulette. Click here
for a point-by-point response based on peer-reviewed science.
When the definitive history of the GMO debate is written,
Jeffrey Smith is going to figure prominently in the
section on pseudoscience. He is the equivalent of an anti-vaccine leader,
someone who is quite successful in spreading fear and false information. (As
David Gorski at the Science-based Medicine blog has noted, the anti-vaccine and anti-GMO movements are two birds
of the same feather.)
For whatever reason, Smith has
become wildly popular among the antis, and his books—however dubiously written
and sourced—are cited as canon by rank and file protestors.
Smith's own Wikipedia bio: A variety of American organic food companies see Smith
“as a champion for their interests,” and Smith’s supporters describe him
as “arguably the world’s foremost expert on the topic of genetically modified
foods.” Michael Specter,
writing in The New Yorker, reported that Smith was
presented as a “scientist” on The Dr. Oz
Show although he lacks any scientific experience or relevant
qualifications. Bruce Chassy, a molecular biologist and food scientist, wrote
to the show arguing that Smith’s “only professional experience prior to taking
up his crusade against biotechnology is as a ballroom-dance teacher, yogic
flying instructor, and political candidate for the Maharishi cult’s natural-law
party.” The director of the Organic Consumers Association says Smith is
“respected as a public educator on GMOs” while “supporters of biotechnology”
have described him as “misinformed and misleading” and as “an activist
with no scientific or medical background” who is known for his “near-hysterical
criticism of biotech foods.”
Per Wikipedia, then, Jeffrey Smith's professional experience is in ballroom dancing and yogic flying.
Honestly, I don’t
think any part of this debate is about us. From my local point of view, this whole
mainland-fueled debate is about national organic farming vs. Monsanto.
fighting this war here means local farmers become collateral damage. All we
farmers want is not to get trampled by the elephants. If we on the Big Island
cannot use biotech when farmers all around us can, we lose and eventually we Big
Island farmers all go out of business. So what if food costs rise for the rubbah slippah folks, right?