Tag Archives: Biofuels

What’s Up With Biofuels?

What’s up with biofuels?

All biofuels are not the same.

Biofuel like the kind Pacific Biodiesel makes is made from used kitchen grease. It is actually recycling; they don’t need to grow the stuff they use to make the fuel. Recycling is good.

But there just isn’t that much waste kitchen grease. In an emergency that biodiesel would be valuable, and reserved for public safety vehicles and for food production.

What about farmer-grown biofuel? Two years ago, farmers sat in discussions that HECO sponsored on the Big Island and Maui. Farmers quickly figured out their return and stopped going to the meetings.

Farmers knew that a barrel of oil weighed 286 pounds. When oil was $80 per barrel, 1 pound of that oil was worth 28 cents. They figured they would have to squeeze at least 4 pounds of stuff to get 1 pound of liquid.

That meant that the most they could get for growing any kind of biofuel stock would be 7 cents per pound. No sense lose money. Better plant cucumber.  Small farmers wouldn’t do it.

If they did do it, it would have to be very expensive—more than $320 per barrel expensive. And as oil prices rise, the cost of growing the biofuel would rise too.

What about cellulosic ethanol? It is still just an idea. Lots and lots of federal money went down the drain trying to force this to work. And as fossil fuel prices go up, the cost of this process goes up too.

And how about algae-to-biofuel? We all hope this will work. But it is still very far off and may never be scalable. “Wishing” and “hoping” is not an energy policy.

Biofuels, except for the kind made from kitchen grease, have an Energy Return on Investment of less than 2 to 1. Dr. Chas Hall says that a modern society needs an EROI of more than 3 to 1 to sustain itself.

More Thoughts on Peak Oil – And Our Solution

I thought that I would revisit a post I did on my first impressions of the Peak Oil conference in Denver this past October. I have added comments to the post I did back then. My new comments are in italics.

Examining Energy Alternatives

I learned something interesting at the Peak Oil Conference I’m currently attending in Denver. It’s about a pattern. When U.S. oil costs exceed four percent of the gross domestic product – so, when the price of oil hits $80 per barrel – we go into recession. (Note that this does not mean oil prices won’t go even higher than $80 per barrel.)

I think that investors are very reluctant to bet against the pattern above. They know that at some point above 4 percent GDP, they will be playing with fire. Last July’s oil price of $147 and the immediate collapse is fresh in their memories as something that can happen. So we watch as the stock market and oil prices twist themselves into a pretzel, according to the strength of the U.S. dollar, the strength of the Chinese economy, the cold winter, the status of Iraq, the riots in Iran, and on and on.

We should be paying attention to the actual supply situation. The natural decline rate of the oil supply is between 5 and 6 percent. That means we need to find 4.5 million gallons per day of new oil supplies — every year — or we are going to be short.

Right now, we have more than enough oil. But Jeff Rubin, former chief economist of CIBC, predicts $225 per barrel oil by 2012 and with it the end of globalization, a movement towards local sourcing and a need for massive scaling up of energy efficiency.

We need to move to geothermal now, not thirty years from now.

David Murphy talked about Energy Return on Investment (EROI), and I asked him what he thought the EROI is for geothermal. He said around 10 to 1, and he agreed with me that it is an attractive alternative energy to pursue for Hawai‘i. This was the consensus of everyone I asked about geothermal. Because geothermal costs are stable, it’s a no-brainer.

Terry Backer, a panel member and long-time Connecticut legislator, pointed out how he sees the economy unwinding. He said that people in his state had been doing okay. In early 2007, although things were tight, people had around a $400-500 per month cushion. But then the price of heating oil was high in the winter, and then the price of gas went to $4.50 per gallon, and food prices went up too. It just stripped people of their “cushion.”

If the consumers have no extra money they cannot buy things. Elizabeth Warren gave this speech that says it all. (Coincidentally her base year is 1970, the year that oil peaked in the U.S.).

The question is, how do we give the middle class disposable income? Choosing the low cost alternative to fossil fuel can help. We have geothermal, which is this.

It’s exactly why we need to move to geothermal. It will stabilize costs, and protect folks forever from ever-higher electricity and water bills that result from rising oil prices.

We need to force that change, not give a thousand reasons why “no can.” Sure we can try other alternatives. But as farmers always say: “What works, works.” Geothermal works.

We must be careful not to end up like Iceland. Fishing and geothermal worked. But instead they started chasing after finance matters, whose foundation rested on sand. Their economy collapsed and now they are left with fishing and geothermal—the things that still work.

And when people start buying electric vehicles, this will protect them from gasoline costs, too. As for businesses, their customers will have more discretionary income to spend. The government will see fewer folks fall through the cracks.

We probably are going to be dependent on gasoline for transportation for a long time. One practical way for Hawai‘i people to protect themselves from high gasoline costs is to buy hybrid vehicles. In Japan, hybrids are a hit. On the Big Island, the more “base power” that comes from geothermal, the more discretionary income people will have. The more discretionary income people have, the more business prospers and the more jobs are available for people who are raising their families.

In the final analysis it is about the consumers. Consumers drive the economy. We tend to forget that.

For native Hawaiians, the use of the geothermal resource will generate revenues in royalties and possibly rents as well. They are consumers, too.

Biofuels, on the other hand, are not expected to be cheaper than oil, and may even need subsidies from consumers. Why would we do that, when we can instead save consumers money by using geothermal?

By now, everyone must be aware that biofuels are wishing and hoping. We wish it would work. Farmers know that it will be very expensive and that it will take money away from consumers.

We need to put in a cable to O‘ahu. They need base/dispatchable power over there, on top of which they can put solar and wind. Without that, O‘ahu will be hopelessly dependent on oil.

All that is true. But we need to take care of the people on the Big Island before we even consider another option. That point was made abundantly clear at a presentation on geothermal I did for the Keaukaha Community Association.  Done right, with community input and community benefit, I’m confident that the people would look favorably on sending power to O‘ahu. But it is a Big Island discussion.

As a farmer, I am concerned about where we are going to get the fertilizer to feed ourselves. Nitrogen, the building block of protein, is extracted from air using high heat and pressure. Oil and gas are what is used now, and that process takes lots of power. But if oil and gas prices rise enough, geothermal power can be substituted. We need to place ourselves in a position to win.

Again, geothermal would generate a lot of royalty money for the Hawaiian people. Without this revenue source, we will see more and more cuts to social services.

I am very encouraged to see that Hawaiians are leading this discussion. This is the right thing to happen.

Geothermal can be a blessing for the Hawaiian people.

If we can maximize its use as a resource for the native Hawaiian people, we will also strengthen our middle class. If we do that our businesses will flourish, everybody will benefit and our future will be hopeful

Positive Changes and Energy Solutions

A few days after the Peak Oil conference has ended, things are starting to become clear.

We have the oportunity to both make positive changes and also solve our energy problems. But we will need help from the University of Hawai‘i at Hilo to analyze Big Island energy options from a holistic point of view.

The distribution curve of median family income is skewed heavily toward low income folks on the Big Island. The median family income in the state is $56,000. On the Big Island, it is $46,000.

Here on the east side of the Big Island, it is in the mid-30,000s. True aloha requires us to fix this, for all our sakes.

Last year when the oil price spiked, gasoline prices spiked as well. For the first time some of my workers asked me if they could borrow money for gas to come to work! The lower income folks were hurt bad.

It is no secret that I believe that biofuels are no solution to our energy problems, because return to the farmers would be too low.

But biofuels would also be as or more expensive than fossil fuels to the final customer. My workers would still have to borrow money for gas. What good is that?

The state of Hawai‘i legally owns our geothermal resource. So any royalties from its use must be paid to the state and to the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA).

Right now, Puna Geothermal Venture pays the state $3.5 million a year, and OHA gets 20 percent of that. That’s $750,000 a year generated from geothermal en to OHA.

Also, the cost to consumers is less than that of fossil fuel and it will not go up when fossil fuel prices go up.

We need to put in more geothermal, not less. More money would go to the state and to OHA. Geothermal has low and stable costs, which results in more discretionary income left in people’s pockets. When they spend that money, businesses can hire workers, who can then take care of their families.

Taking care of people, this is true aloha. The tougher it gets, the more we need to take care of each other.

Geothermal energy is a gift of true aloha.