Category Archives: Renewable Energy Sources

Hydro Power

You have to give the Board of Water Supply, under the leadership of Milton Pavao, credit. While everyone else is talking about alternate energy, the Board of Water Supply is quietly doing something about it. They finished the first hydroelectric unit on Hina Lani Street this past September.

Hydro26
The tall unit on the left is a turbine that generates electricity. It is at the third water tank at the intersection of Hina Lani Street and Queen Kapiolani Highway in Kona.

And now they are working on another at the Kahalu‘u Shaft just above Keauhou.

Hydro24
The hydroelectric generator located just outside the Kahalu‘u Shaft. This generator provides electricity to the three pumps down in the shaft. Additional power is provided by HELCO.

Hydro_20
There are three big water pumps in this shaft located above the Keauhou shopping center, just off the main highway. The Board of Water Supply generates electricity from a higher elevation source. The electricity generated will help to lower the cost of running the three pumps. Savings may be in excess of $150,000 per year. This will benefit all Board of Water Supply customers on the Big Island.

At approximately 40KW, these units are tiny compared to the big generating plants, which can be up to 700 times larger. But they can save the Board of Water Supply system more than $100,000 each. And they have plans to install these kinds of units all over the island. This will stabilize water rates and avoid our having to pay for oil from foreign governments who may not even like us.

I am interested in all this because we plan to install a similar type unit soon at our farm. But I am very concerned, because there seems to be a problem getting permitted under Schedule Q.

Schedule Q applies to small projects that are less than 100 KW in size. By contrast, geothermal is 750 times larger than that. HELCO enables the larger projects by competitive bidding. This insures lowest rates to rate payers.

Schedule Q has different goals and results. It contemplates encouraging alternate small energy production, and it encourages food security as well as economic security through enabling small producers of energy.

The first unit on Hina Lani Street, completed in September, still has not received its permit from the PUC. That is nearly six months. For half a year we haven’t avoided oil usage and Water Supply customers have not received the benefit of its use. I worry that the PUC is contemplating some other payment schedule, rather than the “avoided cost” of using oil, as was the procedure all along under Schedule Q.

Because of the uncertainty, it was suggested that we consider a different rate schedule—something called Net Metering. This means that usage would be accumulated for the month, and if we used more than we generated we would pay the net difference. But if we generated more than we used, we would just give it free to HELCO.

For us, this would make it more difficult to justify starting the project in the first place. Our project is estimated to cost more than a million dollars. And nearly 25% of the unit’s output would not contribute to the loan repayment.

But this is about more than just us. In a world where oil supplies are decreasing and where we, sitting in the middle of the Pacific, are especially vulnerable, we need to encourage more people to provide renewable energy so we can free ourselves from foreign oil. We should encourage our small businesses to produce energy, not discourage them.

Earlier in the session, we submitted a separate bill that attempts to empower farmers by enabling them to finance alternate energy projects under favorable terms. It expected that Schedule Q would continue in effect.

The benefits of this bill are:

1. Food security. If farmers make money, they will farm.

2. Energy security. The less we depend on foreign oil, the more secure we will become.

3. Economic security. If we pay our own businesses for energy instead of paying foreign government for oil, the money will circulate and multiply in our own economy.

The PUC needs to streamline the whole process and it needs to pay “avoided costs” of oil under Schedule Q.

Here is the resolution that we drew up to bring clarity to the PUC regarding the legislative intention of Schedule Q.

Lowering Our Electric Bills

Since the oil shocks of the 1970s, the U.S. mainland has moved away from dependence on foreign oil for its electricity generation. Consequently, electrical generation there is mostly powered by coal, natural gas, hydro power and nuclear. The result is that a kilowatt of electricity on the mainland costs about 8 cents/kilowatt hour.

Though we generate maybe 30 percent of our energy from geothermal and other renewable sources, since contracts used to be based on “oil” costs our electricity rates are now nearly four times higher than on the mainland. This despite the fact that geothermal costs less than half what oil-generated electricity costs.

These days new alternative energy contracts are by competitive bid, so any new form of purchased energy, such as geothermal, would be at lower rates than we pay now.

We need to increase our use of geothermal power here, because overall geothermal is the least expensive of the alternate sources of electrical energy. When electrical costs and water bills rise, it is the poor that first feel the effects. We must figure out how to avoid using foreign oil, because as those prices rise it’s like a giant tax, throwing us into recession. This makes us unable to take care of the most needy.

We need to do something about this and we need to do it quickly, or the least fortunate among us will be hurt very badly.

“The Kahuna Not Going Save Us!”

Farming is one of the first industries to see the direct effects of rising oil prices. Fertilizer, pesticides, packaging, irrigation pumping, cooling and transportation costs are all related to oil costs.

Five years ago, when we were planning to diversify our Kea‘au Banana operation, we knew that China was growing and there would consequently be upward pressure on energy costs, so we set up our new cropping systems to prepare for rising energy costs. Oil cost $30 a barrel then. Two years ago we started noticing creeping inflation—our supply costs were rising slowly but steadily. I started reading about energy issues and I realized we were like the proverbial “frog in a pot with the temperature rising,” and that pretty soon we were going to be done. By the beginning of 2007, oil cost was around $60 per barrel.

Last October, I took my annual trip to the Produce Marketing Association trade show, which was in Houston. Coincidentally, the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO) conference was occurring the following day at the same hotel. I attended. Turns out it was the most important conference I have ever been to. What I know for sure now is that the oil shortage is real. It is happening right now and we need to come to grips with it. It is not about what we wish will happen; it is what will actually happen. It is no longer about us—now it’s about our grandchildren and their children.

I was the only person at the ASPO conference from Hawai‘i and the only one in shorts. By October, oil prices had risen to $80 per barrel. But it was apparent to me that as bleak as the future looks, we in Hawai‘i are very fortunate. First of all, we have sunshine all year long. The sun’s energy helps us grow food and generate electricity—and all year long. And, the biggest deal of all, we have proven geothermal power. Not only to heat houses, as in some places, but to actually generate electricity. I did not have the heart to tell the people I met how fortunate our situation is on the Big Island, let alone that I was going to wear shorts the rest of the winter.

It’s taken nearly three months for the information from this conference to work its way into the mainstream media. In the meantime, at the farm we have been positioning ourselves for a future of oil shortage. Several principles guide us: “The kahuna not going save us.” “Plan for the worst case.” And, most important of all, “Not, ‘no can.’ ‘CAN!’”

We are getting ready to build a hydroelectric plant that will power fifteen 40-foot Matson reefers all day long. This will stabilize our electric bill. We will then convert our farm machinery to electricity wherever possible, using battery-powered forklifts, golf carts, etc. We plan to offer our employees the ability to charge up their plug in hybrid and electric vehicles and a ration of food as an extra benefit of working at Hamakua Springs. And on and on.

We just received our biodiesel kit, which can make biodiesel out of waste vegetable oil from frying tempura. We still remember gas lines, and we want to make sure that our delivery trucks can deliver food on time. We are planning for the worst case scenario. There is no downside to our farm taking this strategic direction.

What about the bigger picture? Can we grow crops for biodiesel and ethanol? Let’s do some quick and dirty calculations. Since there are 42 gallons in a barrel of oil, at $100 per barrel each gallon costs $2.38. There are around eight pounds in a gallon of water—close enough. So, each pound of oil is worth 30 cents. If it takes two pounds of palm nuts to make one pound of oil, the maximum a farmer can expect for farming palm nuts is 15 cents per pound. At three pounds of nuts to make one pound of oil, they’d make 10 cents per pound. So there it is. Farmers aren’t going to farm at those prices. There may be other ways to produce biofuels in a significant scale in the future. Just show us the money.

That leaves electricity as the doable alternative for powering a large part of our transportation and commerce. So, we must seek to lower and stabilize our electricity costs. Besides conservation and changing building codes, we must also start to think of a future of plug in hybrid and electrical cars.

Geothermal energy can produce electricity at less than half the cost of oil and there are other natural sources where the energy source is “free”. That could give us a relative advantage over the mainland, and possibly make us a low-cost, “green” destination for visitors—where we show how maintaining our Hawaiian values in a smart way has made us truly sustainable.

Oil again reached $100 per barrel this week and we must prepare for costs to double and even triple in a few years. We must lower and stabilize our electricity costs by all means. We have the ability to do this. It’s not an option; it’s a necessity. It’s for the sake of our grandchildren’s children.

Not, “no can.” “CAN!”

In Support of Farmers

I testified in person last week at the Hawai‘i State Legislature in favor of Senate Bill 2467 and House Bill 2261. This bill, which I helped draft, helps address important issues of food security, high oil prices and economic development.

Hawai‘i has two very serious issues right now. The first is food security—we are very vulnerable out here in the middle of the ocean and must ensure we can produce enough food for our residents.

The second is our need to get off oil, which we depend upon both for transportation and for generating electricity. Prior to the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO) conference in Houston four months ago, little was reported in the press about the consequences of what are tightening oil supplies. (I was the only Hawai‘i resident to attend that conference; the next one is in Sacramento in September). Since the conference, we are increasingly hearing in the media about oil demand exceeding supply.

The answer to this problem is to generate as much electricity as possible from natural sources here in Hawai‘i, and use as much electricity as possible (vs. oil) for transportation.

Here is my testimony in support of SB2467 and HB2261:

Aloha Chairpersons and fellow representatives:

I am in favor of HB 2261—the Hawai‘i Farm Renewable Sustainable Energy Loan Program. This is a bill that accomplishes three things:

1) It addresses our food security issue by encouraging farmers to farm. If farmers make money, they will farm. This bill will help farmers save money by using alternate energy sources as oil costs rise. If the utilities will buy power from farmers in the future, farmers will make money. Further, farmers can qualify for one hundred percent state income tax credits for alternate energy projects.

2) It helps to wean us from dependence on foreign oil. When farmers produce power, that will help us get off foreign oil.

3) It addresses an economic issue of balance of payments. A dollar saved from having to buy foreign oil is a dollar that can revolve in our local economy.

This bill is necessary because energy projects cost money and in many cases, the savings is in the future. In order for farmers starting energy projects to obtain a positive cash flow sooner rather than later, they must have a lower loan payback for doing energy products as compared to present electricity/power costs. A low down payment and long payback period helps to accomplish this.

Alternate energy projects qualify for one hundred percent state income tax benefits though Act 122. While it is true that investors in these projects can qualify for favorable tax treatment, investors require a return on their investment. If investors finance farmers’ alternate energy projects, the project’s value goes to the investors, not the farmers. If that’s the case, farmers will not waste their time starting alternate energy projects in the first place. That is the main reason this bill is so effective.

Aloha,
Richard Ha
President,
Hamakua Springs Country Farms

The reason this bill is so significant is because it positions farmers to sell electricity to the grid. Instead of sending all our money to foreign countries, why not have our own people generating electricity? It keeps our money circulating in our own economy. And it also aids in our efforts to make ourselves food secure—because if farmers can make money, by selling electricity along with their food products, farmers will farm.

I believe this bill will pass “as is,” along with an amendment that expands its scope and does not detract from the original intent. Because it will be incorporated into an existing Department of Agriculture loan program, there will no need to go through the Attorney General’s office for scrutiny. And since there is no request for funding at the present time, it also will not need to go through the House Finance committee or the Senate Ways and Means committee.

On another, related, topic, we are also working with the U.S. Department of Energy to develop alternate energy projects here on the Big Island.

Things are starting to move! I’ll write about those efforts in another post.

What I can tell you now is that it is all very encouraging.

Huge Energy News for Hawai’i

The U.S. Department of Energy and the State of Hawai‘i announced an unprecedented partnership Monday. The Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative is a brand new partnership between the state and federal governments that aims to have Hawai‘i producing 70 percent of its energy from renewable sources by 2030.

At this point everything is still conceptual, but the state has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the U.S. Department of Energy and this is a major step in the right direction.

I am very much encouraged by this collaboration between the State of Hawai‘€˜i and the U.S. Department of Energy.

It was two years ago that I started noticing creeping price increases. Farmers are some of the first people to see the effects of rising oil prices. Fertilizer, chemicals, irrigation, cooling packaging and transportation costs are directly related to oil prices. A year ago, it started to be very worrisome and I knew there was something serious going on.

In October I was the only person from Hawai‘i at the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO) conference in Houston, where I learned more about Peak Oil’s consequences than I ever wanted to know. Because Hawai‘€˜i is 90% dependent on foreign oil, I knew we were dangerously vulnerable.

I returned from that conference knowing that we in Hawai‘i needed to wean ourselves from fossil fuels or else would go into an unimaginable downward spiral. So I volunteered to sit on the Hawai‘€˜i County Energy Commission. I also volunteered to sit on the Kohala Center’€™s board, because of its good work in the alternate energy field.

Until Monday, though, when the Department of Energy announced its Memorandum of Agreement with the state regarding alternate energy, I really did not see how we could educate enough people in a short enough time to ensure political support for serious alternate energy projects.

This announcement is a very big deal.

I now feel we have enough momentum to start moving forward. In fact, I think we have enough momentum now to do what we need to do in order to protect ourselves from the consequences of Peak Oil.

A Geothermal Tour

I visited Puna Geothermal Venture (PGV) yesterday. It is located past Lava Tree Park, approximately a half mile beyond the “Y” on the way to Kapoho. The property consists of about 500 acres, and the actual production facilities stand on about 35 acres.

Several things impressed me. There are no smoke stacks, and it is an entirely closed system. There are video cameras and monitors to keep track of the environmental quality. And it is set up to be redundant. There are several injection wells and several production wells, each of which can be shut down for maintenance or in an emergency.

How it works: Steam and water come up from the ground, the steam spins a turbine, and then, together with the water and noncondensable gasses, it is reinjected back into the ground.

Very straightforward.

Although I am no engineer, I could tell that in its basic elements it is like the HELCO plant next to Lili‘uokalani Park. The essential difference is that there is no need for oil to make the electricity, and there is no smoke.

I estimate it must cost 1/3 more to build a geothermal plant than it does a conventional, diesel plant—give or take. But a geothermal plant’€™s daily operating costs must be substantially cheaper, because it doesn’€™t bear the cost of having to burn oil.

I know firsthand how expensive this can be. We used to run a smoky diesel generator to pump water for our farm. Now we gravity flow the water instead, and we smile all the time. This is the difference between geothermal- and diesel-fired electric plants.

In the last 15 years, the geothermal power plant has saved Hawai‘i from burning more than 5.5 million barrels of fossil fuel. Imagine if that oil had cost $100 per barrel; this would be a half billion dollars in saved oil purchases.

But it’€™s a little more complicated than that. It doesn’t matter if PGV is very cost effective because this cost is not passed to Hawai‘i’€™s people, nor to HELCO. And PGV is not happy. It would rather sell power at a cheaper rate and be able to expand its production.

How can it be that PGV wants to sell electricity cheaper, but cannot as regulations prevent HELCO from making any money at all on geothermal electricity? The result is that we cannot expand geothermal power, even if it’s the answer to our energy cost problems and we all want it.

Who’s in charge here?

I thought I heard the governor say, in her State of the State address yesterday, that she is trying to allow government agencies to buy power from independent power producers. It seems to me that the County Board of Water Supply, which is one of HELCO’s largest customers, and OHA, at Banyan Drive, will want to buy their power—much cheaper—from Puna Geothermal. People will be thrilled to see their “€œfuel adjustment” disappear!

Palm Oil Debunked

You hear a lot these days about the idea of using palm oil as a source of biodiesel fuel.

Here’s how Big Island farmers think about it. They ask: “So, how much money I going make?”

Let’s see. Say oil is $100 per barrel. There are 42 gallons of oil per barrel, so 1 gallon of oil is worth $2.38. As there are about 8 lbs. of water to a gallon, 1 lb. of oil is worth about 30 cents.

It takes maybe 2 lbs. of nuts to make 1 lb. of oil.

So when oil is $100 per barrel, farmers will make 15 cents per lb. of nuts.

When oil reaches $200/gallon, farmers will make all of 30 cents/lb.

When oil is $300/gallon, they’ll make 45 cents/lb. But they’ll already have lost their farm by then.

No sense, lose money!

Somebody said kukui nuts can be used to make biodiesel, too. But nobody like hire anybody to pick up the mac nuts that stay on the ground right now. No sense, lose money.

Maybe hydroelectric is the answer. After you pay for the pipe and generator, no need fertilize. No more harvest cost. No need work weekends. Eh! No need work.

Same like geothermal! More about that soon.

$100 Oil

We have work to do here in Hawai‘i.

When I went to the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO) conference in Houston a couple months ago, oil had just hit a new record high of $84 per barrel. We conference-goers all knew that oil would hit $100/barrel soon.

Which it did Sunday.

$100 oil!

Several months before that conference, I’d already started noticing that prices for fertilizer and most farming supplies were rising steadily. It seemed unusual. I felt like a frog slowly heating up in a pot on the stove.

As I listened at the conference to speaker after speaker telling us how grim the future looked in the face of declining world oil supplies, it occurred to me how fortunate we are in to live in Hawai‘i where we have abundant alternate energy sources. We have geothermal, hydroelectric, solar and wind power possibilities. I did not have the heart to tell the people I met there how fortunate people in Hawai‘i are in these changing times.

Yet right now, our energy costs are the highest in the nation. Here in Hawai‘i we use 50 million barrels of oil per year. At $100 per barrel, this amounts to $5 billion leaving our economy for the Middle East every year. We need to fix this.

I think that we need to empower our citizens, by subsidies if necessary, so they can sell electricity back to the electric utilities at “peak times.” Instead of relying on only a handful of industrial-sized power plants, we need to spread our risk and empower individuals and small businesses.

After tourism and the military, discretionary income is what powers the local economy. Every dollar we can avoid sending to the Middle East is a dollar that can multiply in our local economy. We must do this because we now have the highest cost electricity in the entire nation.

Why don’t we give the money we would send overseas to our homeowners and small businesses, instead? Wouldn’t we rather pay our neighbors, where the money can circulate in our economy, instead of sending it straight overseas?

We can fix this. Not, no can. CAN!

Tell ’em Rodrigo Sent You

Rodrigo Romo recently wrote up an analysis of how a solar hot water heater installation works.

After the amount it saves you covers the installation cost, the sun makes electricity for you “free.” This is the same principle utilized in the alternative energy Farm Loan Bill that we are submitting to the Legislature this year.

The current High Tech Business Investment Tax Credit, Act 221, gives a 100 percent state income tax credit for alternate energy projects. So farmers can have their projects built free through income tax savings—just like Rodrigo’s solar water heater example.

Rodrigo writes: We just installed a solar water heater in our house this week because there is a pretty good deal going on. We were told that it should cut back the utility bill by about $20 per person, or about $80 dollars a month. The prices listed here include everything (installation too; it is a turn-key price).

The total cost of the system was $6,656, tax included, but the deal is as follows:

Solar System $6,400
Tax $256
Total $6,656

HELCO Rebate ($1,000)
Federal Credit ($1,697) ($5,656 x 30%)
State Credit ($1,980) ($5,656 x 35%)

Balance to pay $1,980

Right now they have a 12 month, zero down and no interest plan. And if you get it done before the end of the year, you get the federal and state credits on this year’s tax return. The state and federal amounts are not an income deduction, but an actual credit.

The guy that sold it to us is Jonathan Ahn (Solar Engineering and Contracting). His number is 966-9066 and his cell is 255-1824. We got an 80 gallon active system which includes the two solar panels and an 80 gallon tank. If you call him, tell him that Rodrigo Romo gave you the information!

Fundamental Assumptions

Sally Odland, a former geologist and project manager, has worked in mineral exploration, oil & gas exploration, environmental remediation, and exhibit design. She wrote this article below (in italics) for The Day, a newspaper in New London, Connecticut, and here I have interjected some comments as they relate to Hawai‘i.

“Who’d have thought we’d already be nostalgic for $80 oil? Only five years ago, a barrel of crude oil was trading comfortably at $25-$30, where it had for 15 years. Today the same barrel fetches $90-something, and it’s anyone’s bet whether oil will break $100 before Christmas. That’s a 300% price increase in five years, 50% in the last year alone. Credible energy analysts predict $200 to $300 oil in the next few years. No wonder the Feds removed energy costs from the core inflation index!” 

In the last few weeks Matson announced a rate hike for its seagoing cargo arriving from the West Coast; Aloha Airlines announced a rate hike of 5 cents per pound for its air cargo; Young Brothers barge company announced a rate hike for interisland freight, and HELCO, our electric utility, announced a rate hike as well. Yesterday, while participating at the Kino‘ole Street farmers market, I was told, unofficially, that UHS will be increasing its fertilizer prices significantly. We know from past experience that the cost of plastic and other supplies  rises with oil prices, but lags as inventories clear out. This means that Hawai‘i farmers’ production costs will be rising. Imported food costs will also start rising as high oil prices work their way through the system.

Our alternate energy Farm Loan Bill will help to stabilize some of the Hawai‘i farmer’s costs and help them become competitive.

“Our fundamental assumptions about the continuing availability of cheap oil to fuel the American lifestyle are being tested. Last year the topic of peak oil—the idea that the world is approaching a maximum limit to oil production—was virtually taboo in polite company and business journals.

This November, however, the Wall Street Journal ran a Page One piece: “Oil Officials See Limit Looming on Production.” If that’s not the definition of peak oil, I’m not sure what is.”

Sunday’s New York Times says that some of the world’s largest oil exporters will no longer export in five to ten years because their own growing economies will use more oil products domestically.

Last week in a landmark speech, Fatih Birol, Head Economist for the International Energy Agency (IEA), was asked the following question, in response to oil-producing countries’ assertions that they would be able to produce an extra 25 million barrels per day. (Note: Until this point, the IEA was notoriously optimistic.)

The question: “Where will the projected extra 25 mb/d oil production come from?”

His response: “If the supply turns out to be less than this, we are in serious trouble. If these projects do not come online, the wheels will fall off our energy system.”

Yes, those were his exact words.

I am the only one from Hawai‘i who attended the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO) conference held in Houston in October. (ASPO is a non-partisan organization with 25 national chapters worldwide). At that time, the mainstream media had largely ignored the world oil supply shortage. Since then, in just the last few weeks, the topic is starting to make headlines in many papers and has become mainstream. All who were at the conference knew how serious the situation was. Now, maybe we can start to deal with the problem.

“For practical purposes, the exact date of “peak” (or more likely “plateau”) oil—whether 2005, 2012 or 2030 as the optimists predict—is immaterial; we have already rolled over to a sellers’ market.

Oil production has been essentially flat—about 85 million barrels a day—for the past two years, despite soaring prices. Strong demand growth in India and China was accommodated only because poorer African and Asian countries were priced out of the market. There is a growing realization that it’s not going to be cheap or easy to grow either capacity or production much beyond the present rates.” 

We know that the world population has increased in parallel to oil production. This is because oil allowed cheap food to be produced. More food equals more people. Now that the oil supply is starting to become short, food will also become short. And people who cannot afford it may not get the food they need.

Here in Hawai‘i we import more than 80 percent of the food we eat. We need to start now in order to produce enough food for all of our people here in Hawai‘i.

“It doesn’t take a crystal ball to predict higher energy prices, greater volatility and periodic supply shortfalls on the 1- to 5-year horizon. Spare oil production capacity is sorely lacking, making the system vulnerable to supply and price shock. This specter is reason enough for families, businesses and local governments to start planning—now!—to dramatically reduce their exposure. We need conservation, but we also need emergency preparedness plans for dealing with the very real potential of disruptions to fuel and heating oil delivery.” 

I am starting to meet more and more people who are doing things now to protect themselves against an uncertain future. One person at the farmers market told me he bought his parents five acres so they could become self-sufficient in terms of food production. He was a manager of a fertilizer company!

Hawaiians have always felt that self-sufficiency was no big deal. For them, it is a given that shipping will sooner or later be interrupted. They can remember when their grandparents were self-sufficient. People back then had a few animals, a taro patch and some ulu trees and they traded. To Hawaiians, it is not difficult—it is a lifestyle.

Someone recently asked me if I knew how expensive sheets are. I admitted that I have no idea. He told me that they purchased a few recently because sheets are made from petroleum products and prices will only go higher. My mom complains about how high canned goods and rice prices are. I know this is just the start. Prices will go much higher. It will be a challenging transition period. I worry that the farmers who are least able to pass on price increases may become discouraged and quit farming.

In order to prepare ourselves for a future of uncertainty, Hamakua Springs Country Farms is planning to make biodiesel on a small scale.  In case there are supply disruptions, we don’t want to wait in gas lines.

“In the longer term—the next 20 to 30 years—we will have no choice but to transition to a reduced petroleum economy. There are compelling reasons why it makes sense to start doing that NOW, rather than waiting until we are 100% certain we’ve passed the point of maximum oil output:

Long lead times for large capital investments. It takes at least 15-30 years to bring revolutionary ideas from research and development to widespread usage. It takes similar time to plan, permit and build major infrastructure—like mass transit or new energy plants, LNG terminals, etc.”

(Garbage to energy?)

“Competition for scarce resources will drive up the future price of raw materials: The building blocks of progress—fossil fuel energy, metals, land—are more abundant and cheaper now than they will be in the future.

Resource nationalism means that certain strategic materials may not be available for import—at any price—in the not-too-distant future. We should reconsider the future value of energy, raw materials, farmland and water.”

We should consider what might happen if oil shipments to Hawai‘i are disrupted. It makes one wonder if we should not be producing our electricity from geothermal, wind, solar, hydro, the ocean, etc., all of which are available naturally here in Hawai‘i, and concentrate on using liquid fuels for transportation.

Why should we be relying on liquid fuels for electricity? Liquid fuels are not natural resources. If we do this, we cannot give Hawai‘i’s small businesses the competitive advantage derived from our natural resources. For example, if we relied on geothermal for most of our electricity, wouldn’t we have a competitive advantage over certain products imported from the mainland that rely heavily on oil for manufacturing? To the extent we could export those items we could still have a complex vibrant society as the dollars would circulate in Hawai‘i rather than being sent away.

On our farm, we are shifting direction. We will use hydro and solar to power electric motors, and replace as many internal combustion engines as possible. For example, we will use electric forklifts instead of diesel. We will use biodiesel primarily for our delivery trucks. It is important that the food we produce is transported dependably and on time.

Unconventional oil won’t bail us out: Canadian tar sands and U.S. oil shale resources may “rival Saudi Arabia,” but they can’t scale up production to match. Oil shales will be lucky to produce 100,000 barrels/day—a 7-minute supply at current U.S. consumption rates—by 2020. Doubling tar sands production to 4 million barrels/day by 2020 (if possible) won’t even offset depletion of existing oil production.

Other parts of the country use oil, natural gas, nuclear power and hydro for their electricity generation. In Hawai‘i, we use mostly imported oil. HECO is running TV ads saying that they are starting to use renewable energy. But renewable energy by itself does nothing for our energy costs. We are hoping the utility can figure out how to translate our free Hawaiian energy sources into cheaper electricity.

The impacts of Peak Oil will be hardest felt at the local and state level. The solution lies in revitalizing local manufacturing, farming and business around the emerging reality of constrained fossil fuel supplies. Peak Oil gives us the opportunity to strengthen and rebuild our local economies and to restore forgotten American—and Hawaiian—values such as ingenuity, resourcefulness and community.

Older people I talk to all say how good it was in the old days. Then, the sugar plantation towns all had company stores, theaters, bakeries, pool halls, boxing teams, etc. There were even medical clinics and transportation back and forth. The plantations must have done something right, as the older people have fond memories of those times.

Before that, the Hawaiians had a thriving sustainable society based on the aloha spirit—and it worked very well.

I think it is important to empower individuals. The farm loan alternative energy bill we are introducing into the legislature will empower individual farmers. Instead of relying only on industrial-sized power plants, there must be ways to incentivize individuals, and especially farmers, to generate electricity at strategic times to inject into the electric grid.

Large-scale bioenergy farming may be economical where there is flat ground and where the infrastructure is in place. But for many, taking the direct route by generating electricity and getting a check from the electric utility makes more sense than growing palm trees, fertilizing, harvesting, hauling, squeezing and shipping the juice to refineries and then getting a check. Incentivizing and empowering individuals helps to spread risk. Long supply chains and just-in-time inventories have made us vulnerable.

NASA incorporates multiple redundancies before they send astronauts into space. We, too, should spread our risks.  

Sally Odland currently administers a division of research geophysicists at Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia
University. Sally holds advanced degrees in Geology and Business
Administration. Her MBA dissertation, “Strategic Choices for Managing the Transition from Peak Oil to a Reduced Petroleum Economy” is online here. She serves as a volunteer Board Member of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO-USA).